Some men. Not all. You see, the problem with all these ideologies, not just feminism, is they view the world in absolutes.

What exactly do you mean by patriarchal system? In what way is there a patriarchy? There is only a small cadre of men that are cunning, intelligent, and narcissistically psychotic enough to attain power. The overwhelmingly vast majority of men lack power. A huge proportion of people who are disaffected are men. Most people in prison are men. Most homeless people are men. Most victims of violent crime are men. Most people who commit suicide are men. Most people who die in wars are men. People who do worse in school are men. Where exactly is the dominance here?

What you're doing is taking a tiny substrata of hyper successful men, and using that to represent the entirety of western society.

Additionally, what has all that empowerment, and especially your anger, gotten?

By the end of the decade, greater than 50% of women over the age of 40 will be unmarried/never marry. Does that bring women happiness?

Again, you're viewing the world in absolutes. You're viewing the relationship between men and women as adversarial rather than cooperative. This only sows further division. Ultimately, in your writing, you have to ask yourself: Do you want to divide people or bring them together?